Talk:Sanjurjada

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sanjurjada article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / Spanish C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Spanish military history task force

rebel leader

have reverted the edit which claimed Sanjurjo was the rebel leader; went back to the edit which points to Barrera. It was Barrera agreed to be the nominal leader of the rising, and he indeed tried to assume such role, preparing to enter the Ministry of War once it is seized. Sanjurjo was agreed to head the coup in Seville, and this is what he did. The whole rising was named after Sanjurjo not because he was the leader, but because of the media attention given during court proceedings afterwards. Have discussed all this in the very article years ago. --Dd1495 (talk) 08:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

mini-flags in infobox

mini-flags put next to the rebels are the monarchist roja y gualda colors. This is misleading, as it suggests that the rebels were monarchists. Though some of them indeed were, others were not. The monarchist question was not raised during the coup. Actually, the Sanjurjo manifesto pledged to defend the constitutional (i.e. republican) order. Suggest either to remove all mini-flags, or to mark both sides with tri-color republican ones. --Dd1495 (talk) 08:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no challenge to the above. Hence, I am removing the flags, --Dd1495 (talk) 12:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

reverting misleading and erroneous edit, this time by Thrylaraol, which implies monarchic background of the coup and wrongly claims that Sanjurjo was its leader.--Dd1495 (talk) 10:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hello Thrylaraol, you again reverted to the misleading version, with no explanation whatsoever. Before you do this again, could you please provide some rationale. rgds, --Dd1495 (talk) 05:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

again and again, another attempt to put misleading info as discussed above, this time by a user with no proper account. Also, this time with even more far-reaching misleading and entirely unreferenced suggestions, namely that the USSR supported the loyalists and Italy supported the rebels. Reverting again and alerting WP admins. --Dd1495 (talk) 11:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]