Talk:Scalix

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sales Literature

This page is not NPOV. The use of the word "robust" in association with scalix is laughable. I have used scalix daily for the past six years, and it's been a horrible, soul-mangling experience. Florian does not allow users to see or contribute to the code base, the off-shore support staff are completely unfamiliar with the product they are "supporting", and there hasn't been a bug fix or release for years now. Please do not harm yourself or your company by believing the myth of "robust" "open source" scalix - there is no such thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.180.229 (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scalix proprietary or open source?

is Scalix still considered proprietary?

If I look at this, http://www.scalix.com/community/opensource/ most of the core components have been opensourced. Riaanvn 15:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that only a stripped-down version of Scalix is open source. If you want the fully functional version you have to buy it. Art Cancro 20:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ajax-based?

I know what Ajax is, but what exactly is ajax-based? Isn't it really based in xhtml/html?

The SWA is web based and relies heavily on AJAX. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.171.50.224 (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Company vs. Product

So is this article about the product Scalix or about the company Scalix? The infobox on the page is a Template:Infobox Software type. If their is consensus about that the company is the focus, I'll change the infobox to the Template:Infobox Company and move discussion of the product down to a section (i.e. their "flagship product") Cander0000 21:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The company is now part of Xandros and the article is about the product ... richi —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 22:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oppose, idem. Mion 18:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scalix Community vs Enterprise

This article currently seems to talk about the community version which is under the Scalix Public License, while the Enterprise version has it's own license, yet there is no mention of this. --Hm2k (talk) 11:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The product described on the Wikipedia page is not actually Scalix - the Community Edition does not have all the stated features, and the Enterprise Edition is not open source (Florian does not allow even paying customers access to sources). The imaginary product described on this page, however, is what most customers think/thought they are/were getting. The screenshot is from SWA, Enterprise Edition.