Talk:Schneider's Bakery
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
DanWarp Technology?
[edit]Anybody ever think the "DanWarp technology" thing may just be the DanWarp logo in the title screen? ----DanTD (talk) 01:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Merge proposal:List of iCarly parodies
[edit]Somebody keeps writing variations of a list of fake product-placement names for iCarly. Since these names pre-date iCarly, and have been used on other Dan Schneider productions, I propose moving that list here as a separate chapter, and adding less emphasis on their presence on iCarly. ----DanTD (talk) 22:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- perhaps, but without third party sourcing, this existance of this article is also questionable. and without third party sourcing regarding the parodies, do they really belong anywhere? Active Banana (bananaphone 22:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Just what kind of "third-party sourcing" do you find acceptable? The Wahoo Punch logos are carbon copies of the Hawaiian Punch logos. A screen cap of that and any other fake product is proof enough. ----DanTD (talk) 03:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- The the kind of third party sourcing that WP:N states is needed for the existance of a stand alone article - significant coverage in reliable third party sources. And your above example fails WP:OR being based on observations and comparisons of an editor. Active Banana (bananaphone 21:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- The hell it does. My example is anything but OR. ----DanTD (talk) 17:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it is entirely WP:OR requiring the comparison and analysis of two different objects that are not part of the same whole WP:SYN. Active Banana (bananaphone 21:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- The the kind of third party sourcing that WP:N states is needed for the existance of a stand alone article - significant coverage in reliable third party sources. And your above example fails WP:OR being based on observations and comparisons of an editor. Active Banana (bananaphone 21:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Just what kind of "third-party sourcing" do you find acceptable? The Wahoo Punch logos are carbon copies of the Hawaiian Punch logos. A screen cap of that and any other fake product is proof enough. ----DanTD (talk) 03:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Table headers?
[edit]The table in the section "Shows" has no headers. I don't know what the columns mean. → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ Ⓜ 01:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Schneider's Bakery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090415090107/http://community.livejournal.com/groovysmoothie/247277.html to http://community.livejournal.com/groovysmoothie/247277.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2019
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- ! Show ! Creator(s) ! Years In Production ! Years Aired ! # of seasons ! # of episodes produced ! Status ! Logo Danield052001 (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 18:50, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
What I like About you
[edit]Should this show even be included in the list? I don't ever remember it using the Schneider banner. All That is included as the final Season was produced by the bakery. I removed The Amanda show from a different edit as that was never produced by the bakery. Agentdoof (talk) 19:48, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Schneider's Bakery wasn't involved in the creation of What I Like About You. Dan did create it but the Bakery wasn't involved. Dan left What I Like About You after the second season. --Frittleman (talk) 19:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- I looked into more in-depth and I agree, it is not bakery produce show. Agentdoof (talk) 00:06, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
TV films and specials removed altogether
[edit]A few months ago I removed the production dates [1], as everything was coming from this website [2], witch isn't really a WP:RS, plus I don't think production dates are needed for every Movie/Special. Seeing that TV films and specials section is just episodes from the show, is this section really needed at all? Mainly I want to check before I just get rid of the section. Is it made of Wood (talk) 23:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Something you should change.
[edit]That isn't a title screen. That is a logo. There is a difference between title screens and logos. Example, title screens appear at the start of games and shows. A logo is different and appears at the end (or opening in most cases).
Second, both AVID and Logopedia, as well as other logo wikis, state the logo as debuting in 2004. This is also helped by most Nickelodeon airings on YouTube showing the early variant of the logo appearing at the end of their shows. DarkModeEditor (talk) 23:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class Nickelodeon articles
- Low-importance Nickelodeon articles
- Nickelodeon task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles