Talk:Science and Development Network

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Wouldn't have this was a speedy. Would have thought it a AFD. --OscarTheCattalk 19:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

commercial v npo ads?[edit]

Given SciDev.Net is not a commercial organisation, has no commercial interests, doesn't have anything to sell (even web subscriptions) and is mostly funded by charitable and public sector organisations, I think it's a bit harsh to call its article an advert.

After all, Wikipedia has entries for Oxfam, Science and Nature. Only one of those is an npo, and all of them have products to sell.

But I'd agree that the language of this article needs to be changed to make it NPOV. Anyone with good editing skills want to have a go?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Science and Development Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)