Talk:Seabrook Island, South Carolina
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in South Carolina may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
200 BC?
[edit]The first line of the "History" section - "Seabrook has a known archaeological history dating back to approximately 200 B.C." - seems to have no context, no relevance to anything else in the document, and seems unsubstantiated - a basic google search finds nothing about this. In fact, if you google anything about Seabrook Island & 200 BC, or archaeological findings, it seems to mostly come back with sites that have copied the wikipedia article verbatim, without doing any fact-checking themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishmayl (talk • contribs) 13:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
- Digging a bit more, I found this link that tells a bit more: http://books.google.com/books?id=Q899oPRI3q0C&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=seabrook+island+archaeology+200+BC&source=bl&ots=y06_LRzhrR&sig=nJEJpbCzM5nqNFrZjwEIrBfprHc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=rzTtUfLeGIaM9AST64CwAw&ved=0CFUQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=seabrook%20island%20archaeology%20200%20BC&f=false ...this is from "Insiders' Guide to Charleston Including Mt. Pleasant, Summerville, Kiawah, and Other Islands" in 2007, and at least provides a bit more information, though there is still no documentation from any actual studies or reports. -Brandon (talk) 13:40, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Ishmayl
Categories:
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class South Carolina articles
- Low-importance South Carolina articles
- WikiProject South Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in South Carolina