Talk:Rascal Does Not Dream

Mai Sakurajima was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 October 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rascal Does Not Dream. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rascal Does Not Dream article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

min-width property

Two different IPs, 86.134.122.210 and 2A00:23C1:6161:3000:F4FA:F7F7:EF3F:57FF, changed the min-width property of the title column to a regular width property. The min-width property was included to set a minimum width for the title column while still allowing it to remain fluid. Without the property, the title column will become compressed on smaller screens, such as mobile devices, to the point where the contents become unreadable. I have checked the table on mobile and min-width property functions as intended. Thus I am left completely stumped as to why the IPs changed the property from min-width to width and have reverted the change. Will either of these editors explain why they, identify their OS and browser—and maybe device as well? —Farix (t | c) 21:39, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the min-width property to apply to the entire table instead. Please discuss any further changes explaining why you believe the change is necessary. —Farix (t | c) 00:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2018

This edit request to Rascal Does Not Dream of Bunny Girl Senpai has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Above the anime episode list the article does not say it can be streamed on hulu(which is what I did). It only says, "Aniplex of America has licensed the series and it is streamed on crunchyroll." This makes no mention of hulu. Ferecendalestial (talk) 03:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. There is no mention of it because nobody has provided a source. You want your edit request to be considered? Then provide a reliable source. This makes me glad that the article is protected because otherwise, I would have to revert whoever says Bunny Girl could be streamed on Hulu without providing a source. Sk8erPrince (talk) 07:15, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sk8erPrince: How would you like us to prove these things to you? I have watched Rascal on Hulu since it started. In fact, I watched the latest episode (ep. 12) this morning, even though Wikipedia says it is broadcast on Dec 20. What should we do to cite our sources? Svyatoslav (talk) 03:59, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unite manga cells for english release

I don't know how to do it, but since the english release by yen press covers with his first volume the first two of the japanese, and with his second the volumes 3-4 of the japanese, the rows in the fourth column should be fused together. I tried to do so but I am not really good at it. Thanks for the help. (Also there is a date and an isbn for the second volume of the manga, we should add that too).--PersiaF (talk) 18:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a bit too snobby?

> WikiProject Anime: This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I get it that "High Importance" category would be reserved for e.g. a Shinkai x Ghibli collaborative 4D movie but to call Aobuta "Low importance" is kind of silly. How does one categorize the N+1th bottom scrape carbon-copy isekai then?

Aobuta was a huge hit on TV in JDM and overseas as well and enthusiasm lasted, so they made a movie sequel and 4000 otaku lined up for the exclusive premiere reserved to 500. So many people were touched, which led to a nasty virtual crusade by the Bakemonogatari posse (who accused Aobuta of being a rip-off and tried, unsuccessfully, to game the review scoring system on MAL and other sites to bring it down to 5/10).

This scandal shows even the most leet weebs found Aobuta important enough to rise up against it, so a "Medium" rating should be warranted. Especially with the second feature-lenght sequel movie already in production, which is quite unprecedented in recent years due to "1-cour-and-drop" becoming the rule of anime adaptation. 188.143.7.225 (talk) 23:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manga adaptation of Siscon Idol

According to this Anime News Network article, a manga adaptation of the fourth novel, Rascal Does Not Dream of Siscon Idol will be made, but hasn't started yet. Should this be added to the page? 2600:4040:A3AF:DB00:AD0B:B824:47B0:F30E (talk) 00:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]