Talk:Selby District

Yorkshire High‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Selby District is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Any special reason why there is a Selby (district) page, separate from the main Selby page? I don't really see the logic in it: most local authorities comprise more than one settlement and it's a simple matter to incorporate these things into the main article. It already appears to be causing confusion to the extent that one contributor has added material about the Abbey on the district page, something which is already amply covered in the main page. I propose a merger. --Archstanton 01:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The two should be separate, as they are for all other such cases. The town, the local government district, and the parliamentary constituency are all three different things. Uncle G 03:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree that they should be kept separate, it is perfectly possible for a single article to draw the distinctions between the town, local government district and parliamentary constituency. I think it confuses the average reader, who I very much doubt cares about such distinctions. However, it does seem that separate pages have been drawn up for many UK locales, so I'll (grudgingly) concede that the structure will have to stay as it is, unless it is challenged at a higher level.
  However, if we must have a separate page to cover the administrative aspects, it shouldn;t really duplicate material that is found in the town page. --Archstanton 14:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - We have a whole WikiProject on this, and a uniform approach. The local government districts, the towns, and the constituencies are all distinct. Uncle G 01:54, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough.--Archstanton 14:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

While we're at it, it does seem that the referendum reference is well out of date. The ballot was held about a year ago(?) and the proposal was decisively rejected. Shall we work on an update? --Archstanton 14:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Archstanton 14:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Selby District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060208234800/http://www.selbyreview.co.uk/ to http://www.selbyreview.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]