Talk:Sentimental Education

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Novels: 19th century Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by 19th century task force.
	This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 08:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiprojectNovel template

I just updated this article using the wikiproject:novel template for books. However, there are several sections that I've "hidden" using comment tags because I haven't had time to enter any new text. These include "Major Themes," "Literary Reception," "Plot Summary," "Explanation of title." I will try to get to these as I finish this work. Meanwhile, anyone else feel free to get into the article and add them! Portia1780 (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Henry James and reception

Does Henry James's reaction to the book jibe with the wider literary world's, or is it that no one could find another review? The reception section seems too harsh with only the James quotation in it.--89.131.185.247 (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not just that; it contradicts the opening paragraph. – (empoor) 15:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the section needs to be expanded and balanced. Please feel free to add. As far as the opening paragraph goes, it's impossible to verify as the sources are in French. Actually this is a policy violation as per: WP:NONENG. I think I'll tag it. ~ Alcmaeonid (talk) 19:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the coverage of contemporary reviews ought to be expanded. James’ review is not typical of the contemporary reception of the novel. Endymion.12 (talk) 15:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]