|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sepsis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Sepsis.
|WikiProject Medicine / Translation||(Rated B-class, Top-importance)|
|This article is/was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Assigned student editor(s): Aives95.|
|Threads older than 90 days may be archived by.|
Does sepsis increase long-term mortality
"Septicaemia" got lost on the way
It redirects here, but is not mentioned anywhere (unless you count in the caption of the WWII propaganda poster). I am a layman, but judging by the paper quoted here below, they're not fully synonymous. So?
Sepsis, septicaemia, sepsis syndrome, and septic shock: the correct definition and use.
- What is the name of the sysmptomes caused by wounding oneself with a contaminated object (eg: rusty nails and the like)? I expected the article for sepsis cover this accident as well as the onset of typical symtomes and the necessary steps to be taken in such cases. what I found instead, is an article with a very broad, generic idea of sepsis as contrasted to the old fashioned blood poisononing and with absolutely no practical information regarding the later. I appreciate science's developement, that implies now the meaning of sepsis in a much broader term than what i was told as a child about getting sick with blood poisoning when a wound caused by some a dirty, soiled, or rusty object is not given proper care, but i wish that the information regarding latter would be not hidden from the public. The poster used for illustration does mention "scratch" through which sepsis can be caused, which impies, that in those dark times people were aware of the dangers of "a rusty nail caused wound". Its sad, tht this is not available knowledge anymore. I think this article needs a section dealing with the "blood poisoning caused by a wound", even if the term itself fell out of favor.
Well, I guess i was looking for Tetanus. Still, just to avoid confusion, the article probably could make a mention of both conditions and a warning against confusion of one with the other. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC).
No, the tetanus article does not deal with "blood poisoning from an infected wound", so I am still at loss. Probably the proverbial blood poisoning is just any kind of wound infection that could be caused by a wide variety of bacteria. I am still wondering, why this condition is not covered in any of the related articles. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 23:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC).
- You are probably thinking of a systemic bacterial infection originating from a wound. 'Blood poisoning' is sometimes used to refer to this in popular conversation, even if there is no sepsis. Tetanus is something different and much more specific. --Ef80 (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Although comprehensive and well referenced, some of this article is written in very clunky English and it would benefit from a copyedit. I don't intend to do this myself as I don't want to run the risk of inadvertently modifying information. --Ef80 (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)