Talk:Set of all sets
rewritten
[edit]The previous version of this article contained misinformation. I have rewritten it.
Randall Holmes 15:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Could the content of this article possibly be stated in layman's terms as well, or would that create redundancy? Sorry, never mind, I just read the Russell's paradox article and that made it more clear Evan Donovan 00:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)