Talk:Sharity

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disambiguation

Is "sharity" not a common enough name for media redistribution to call for a disambiguation page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.180.126 (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, no, it's not. I've never heard it as anything other than the name for that particular SMB client implementation. Guy Harris (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically: there are no other WP articles named "Sharity", so what would you be disambiguating?--NapoliRoma (talk) 23:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Self-reference

Note that the third link (reddragdiva LiveJournal) is my own blog. If others think it's not a fair reference, or if there's a better one, feel free to remove it. The point of it was to show other Solaris admins recommending it as a way to go rather than using NFS from SFU.

You can tell this article was written from personal experience ;-) - David Gerard 11:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]