Talk:Simultaneous localization and mapping/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs) 01:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello there! Thank you for submitting this article to Good Articles Nominations. After taking a quick glance through the article, I will have to quick fail this article based on WP:GAFAIL and the Good Article criteria. Specifically, this article has a lot of statements that are not referenced, making this far from reaching Criteria #2 Verifiable with no original research. The following is a detailed review of what is unreferenced:
Mathematical description
[edit]- The entire section does not have any references.
Algorithms & subsections
[edit]- Kinematics modeling, Loop closure, and Exploration: these subsections in this section do not have any references at all.
- Mapping, Sensing, Audio-Visual SLAM: While some sentences are cited, there are a lot of sentences without references.
- Algorithms, Acoustic Slam, Biological inspiration: while some of these sentences are cited, there are some sentences without references.
Implementations
[edit]- While this is one sentence, no references are included in this section.
History
[edit]- A little bit of this section is unreferenced.
Overall
[edit]Overall, I have three concerns in regards to verification:
- 1): The Kinematics modeling, Loop closure, and Exploration subsections of the Algorithms section do not have any references at all. Similarly, the entire Mathematical description and Implementations sections have no references.
- 2): Many sentences of the Mapping, Sensing, and Audio-Visual SLAM subsections have a loot of sentences without references.
- 3): Parts of the Algorithms (main paragraph), Acoustic Slam, Biological inspiration and History sections have sentences that require references.
I believe if these issues were corrected, this article would have a better chance if if was renominated again in the future. Please see Wikipedia:Good article criteria for what makes a Good Article, and especially Wikipedia:Verifiability for some tips in how to verify sentences. Also, I noticed that this nomination was your first edit. If you are a newer editor and have any questions, please feel free to leave a comment at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Thanks for submitting to Good Articles Nominations! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)