Jump to content

Talk:Sir John Fowler, 1st Baronet/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


An informative, well-referenced, well-illustrated article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced; but the three ICE web links (refs 8, 9 and 10) seem to have moved and now need updating.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Yes. In checking some of the claims using additional references not used in the article, I found various well-known railway engineers who had trained under Fowler. There is no section on prodigies - it might be worth adding one.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Well illustrated.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Well illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing a well research article on a railway/engineering topic. Pyrotec (talk) 20:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]