Talk:Soaplife
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Soaplife proposed edit
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
This is the new version, it updates where the offices now are, and advises on who are the editorial contacts in case people need to know. it is largely the same copy, but just updates to add in new facts about the titles, I previously updaed the ABC figures these are referenced.
Thanks Clare
It is suggested that it reads: please ok:
Soaplife is a fortnightly UK magazine, published every other Tuesday by Time Inc. UK (formerly IPC Media) and and its offices are based at 161 Marsh Wall on the Isle of Dogs in London.
Popular soaps featured are EastEnders, Coronation Street, Doctors, Emmerdale, Hollyoaks, Neighbours and Home and Away.
History and profile
The magazine was launched in 1999 as a one-off to tie in with the British Soap Awards when its sister TV listings title, What’s on TV, did not have enough space to print all the backstage pictures. Its selling figures were impressive and it quickly established itself as a monthly title shortly afterwards.
In 2003, under editor Hellen Gardner, Soaplife increased its frequency and it became a fortnightly magazine.
The title is now edited by Paul Brooks, with deputy editor Alison Gardner, art editor Brian Hawthorne and picture editor Paul Smith.
Soaplife belongs to Time Inc’s family of television magazines, which form the company’s TX group and is overseen by group editor Colin Tough. TX includes What’s on TV, TV & Satellite Week and TV Times.
Tvupdates (talk) 13:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi there. One of the Wikipedia's core policies is verifiability, which means that all content added should be verifiable (have reliable sources supporting the material). Seeing that your proposal lacks sourcing, I will go ahead and decline it. Feel free to resubmit once you have added sourcing. Regards, VB00 (talk) 13:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)