Jump to content

Talk:Social impact assessment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2020 and 17 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cmsandov.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement

[edit]

The definition of social impact assessment appears incomplete. The sources do list Vanclay which defines SIA, but it is not inline sourced, and Vanclay could be used to strengthen the SIA definition. In the origins paragraph, a mention of the National Environment Policy Act (NEPA) would help strengthen that section. The article already notes that SIAs are performed as a part of EIS, but it didn't note that under NEPA, federal agencies must perform EISs or face legal action. Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessments and the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) would be good sources for future article expansion. Gannta (talk) 02:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC) --Alex 08:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Social Impact Assessment and private enterprise

[edit]

I think that there is value in discussing the role of SIA in private enterprise development as opposed to donor based development. In particular I think we could look at elaborating the links with notions such as "triple bottom line" and "corporate social responsibility". --campdog 05:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title of article

[edit]

Should the article be named Social Impact Assessment instead of Social impact assessment ? SUBZ3R0 ( Talk | E-mail ) 08:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article improvement

[edit]

The article is a mess and too brief at the moment: SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT International Principles May 2003 Special Publication Series No. 2 by Prof Frank Vanclay Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research provides a good summary to base an article on. Not only all the oter refs provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.162.68.41 (talk) 16:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]