Talk:South Korea and the World Bank
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 October 2019 and 14 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tonamhey. Peer reviewers: Isaccaquino.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]1. The lead section provides information that is connected to the other sections of the article. 2. There is a clear structure that is easy to understand and there is a natural flow/structure because it goes from 1970s-present 3. Each section has equal amounts of content on it (subsections). 4. The author was neutral and did not use information that shows his opinions or perspective . 5. At time of review, wikipedia page/draft is still unfinished but so far, the author's sources come mainly from the World Bank itself. Angelaebalo (talk) 20:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Angelaebalo
Nanxi lead section is very good it gives us a clear history of South Kore a going from being a borrower to a lender to other countries. Most details could be added to make it better but it's fine as is. Isaccaquino (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)isaccaquino
Nanxi, has a very clear structure in his project it gives us a clear history at the beginning and continues on. It tells us about before 1970 and what happens after words but also describes the relationship. Isaccaquino (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)isaccaquino
The balanced coverage is fine because it's not a lot of information being thrown at once. It's divided into two sections and then describes the representation of the World Bank and South Korea. Isaccaquino (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)isaccaquino
The content that is provided in this article is very neutral because it doesn't state anything controversial. Yet, it sticks to the point of given all the information that is available. Isaccaquino (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)isaccaquino
When it comes to sources the only problem is that this article only has three sources from the six that are required. But this is still a draft, so it could be improved on or Nanxi could be working on it as I am editing. But the sources he uses are credible and come straight from the World Bank. Isaccaquino (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)isaccaquino
Something that could help this article overall is if he added some pictures of the country. As well as a picture of the World Bank Governor and Executive Director. Isaccaquino (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)isaccaquino