Talk:Soviet destroyer Smely (1939)
Appearance
![]() | Soviet destroyer Smely (1939) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 13, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet destroyer Smely (1939)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 01:21, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Looking at this one. —Ed!(talk) 01:21, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written:
- Pass One one note: Sentence beginning with "20" should have numeral spelled out. Preferred for consistency that numerals over 10 be presented ("fifteen minutes") but this is sufficiently stringent for GA criteria.
- Dab links, dup links, external links tools all show no problems. Copyvio tool shows green.
- Pass One one note: Sentence beginning with "20" should have numeral spelled out. Preferred for consistency that numerals over 10 be presented ("fifteen minutes") but this is sufficiently stringent for GA criteria.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- Pass Offline sources accepted in good faith. A cursory check of the source material on Google in English sources backs up material cites in the article.
- It is broad in its coverage:
- Pass Appropriate context included from ship class article; additional detail really only has a place there for consistency.
- Would prefer to have a unit cost, but records on this subject aren't common in the source material as I understand it.
- Article doesn't explicitly state it, but looking at the source material online the lack of fatalities in the sinking would be notable to include if possible.
- Pass Appropriate context included from ship class article; additional detail really only has a place there for consistency.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
- Pass Sufficient mix of third-party sources in both Russian language and other contemporaries.
- It is stable:
- Pass No problems there.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- Pass One image included under public domain tag where appropriate.
- Other:
- Pass A few relatively minor suggestions, though given the short history of the subject material as well as the comprehensive nature of relevant context, I don't see a need to place the article on hold for these to be fixed. So, passing the article for GA. —Ed!(talk) 05:15, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Soviet Union articles
- Low-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles