Talk:Special mission unit

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Special mission unit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Military history: South Pacific / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Seal of the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreement between this "Special mission unit" page and "Joint Special Operations Command" page

The special mission unit page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_mission_unit) is linked from the section on "special mission units" from the JSOC page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Special_Operations_Command#Special_Mission_Units), but the two have different information. JSOC notes that there are 5 identified special mission units (though the bulleted list includes six); the special mission unit page notes that there are 4 identified SMUs. The two additional units in the first list are The Army's Regimental Reconnaissance Company (RRC) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regimental_Reconnaissance_Company) and the Joint Communications Unit (JCU) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Communications_Unit). The RRC's site notes it is designated as an SMU, while the JCU site does not specify.

128.244.87.109 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing this inconsistency. I noted this also (below in another section) but you noticed this more thoroughly, and before I did. I guess that we are asking that some knowledgable people familiar with this particular military area please clarify this information. Apparently it has been two and a half years since this problem was first identified, so I will not be holding my breath for a clarification any time soon. L.Smithfield (talk) 01:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correct Terminology

Regarding the Army's " Intelligence Support Activity"

"maintained" and "direct control" are meaningless, non-doctrinal terms that do not in any way accurately depict the command relationship of the ISA. This should be clarified or deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.104.23 (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

US Special Mission Units (SMUs)

The text says that there are seven SMUs that have been specifically designated as such. What are these? The text is not clear about what the names of these seven units are. Five of these seem to be clearly mentioned, but what are the other two? Why cannot the authors just list the seven units in a numbered list, so that the names of the seven units are completely clear? OK, a bullet list is fine, but it has to be entirely clear, using seven bullets. Can this please be fixed (cleared up)? Are there indeed seven clearly specified (revealed) SMUs or was this number (seven) a mistake in the first place? L.Smithfield (talk) 01:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. - wolf 03:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. L.Smithfield (talk) 08:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about ...

... G.I. Joe (the code name for America's daring, highly-trained, Special Mission force)? 2605:8D80:680:A9EC:85BC:1F2A:B042:826B (talk) 03:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source? - wolf 11:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]