Talk:Stamp album

Philately High‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge from Stamp stock book

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was: Merge proposal withdrawn by nominator. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 03:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm proposing this merge because the new article seems to be about a kind of style of a stamp album and that this existing article would be improved by a discussion of different album styles. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 14:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable as long as there is a redirect so that link I wrote the article to satisfy is not left isolated again. Quandon 15:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed the merge tag here and must disagree for several reasons. Besides which I was working on a draft article Stockbook that is online now and is a well rounded article with detail and references as well as appropriate illustrations a correct properly title for the topic. I had been in contact with the editor who added most of the images to Stamp album pointing out that the images did not belong because they were not of stamp albums but of stockbooks. I agreed to look for stamp album images for that article and use his stockbook images for the stockbook article. Additionally I had already added one proper image to stamp album and will try to find more.

Stockbooks, are known as that, and not as "Stock books" or "Stamp stock books", that is why I missed it. They are not stamp albums but a completely different postage stamp storage device so would be inappropriate if incorporated into the stamp album article. Dealers who sell stamp storage devices sell stamp albums AND stockbooks. For these reasons stockbooks should not be included in the stamp album article.

So I recommend that:

Stamp stock book becomes a redirect to Stockbook
Stamp stockbook should be created as a redirect to Stockbook
Stamp album should have a "See also" added to Stockbook
The merge tags removed.
We need to find some more or better images for Stamp album. To start with here is one I uploaded a while ago to start with.

Hope you agree. If so I will do the work. Cheers ww2censor 23:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with ww2censor's proposals. Stamp album and Stockbook are two different entities.--PremKudva^Talk 03:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very well then, I'll withdraw this merge proposal. It does seem, though, that Stamp stock book should be merged and redirected to Stockbook. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 03:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

File:Filatelie.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Filatelie.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]