Talk:Stanisław Koniecpolski/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Capitalize Field Marshal and Battle of ...
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Books need place of publication
- Why is there an m-dash in the page numbers for a lot of the books? One example is cite 25. And why are they pp.? Locations should be available for the books that don't have one by going to the picture of the cover and going forward a page or two. I tested it on cite 91 and should work on most of the remaining books. It doesn't matter here, but you'll need to capitalize your titles according to Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Composition_titles for the ACR.
- Books need place of publication
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Disambiguate Porta. I think you mean the Sublime Porte, but check.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Capitalizations: done.
- Cite book implemented, added locations where I could find them.
- Yes, I meant Porte (Polish is Porte)
- Do let me know what else can be fixed! (Next step, I will submit it for MILHIST A-class review) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pages standardized (pp. for multiple pages, p. for single pages). I also added few more of the (useless...) locations. Can you point me to the policy that makes book locations a requirement in GA/FA process? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Cite#Citation_styles_and_consistency says that locations are optional so feel free not to add any more. However, most every academic citation style I've used requires them, so people may tell you to add them at FAC or ACR because that's what they're used to seeing. I'll look over your changes tomorrow; it's time for bed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Cite#Citation_styles_and_consistency says that locations are optional so feel free not to add any more. However, most every academic citation style I've used requires them, so people may tell you to add them at FAC or ACR because that's what they're used to seeing. I'll look over your changes tomorrow; it's time for bed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pages standardized (pp. for multiple pages, p. for single pages). I also added few more of the (useless...) locations. Can you point me to the policy that makes book locations a requirement in GA/FA process? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)