Talk:Starbreeze Studios/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have this finished soon. Maybe in a day or two. JAGUAR 21:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

The lead is perfect
"Starbreeze attempted to acquire another studio, Rock Solid Games, but the agreement between the two fell apart and brought both companies financial problems" - needs citation
"Starbreeze again encountered financial difficulties having not received a significant royalty payment from Vivendi" - Starbreeze again encountered financial difficulties after having not received a significant royalty payment from Vivendi?
"and helped the company to make a record profit for the first time after suffering an accumulated loss" - de-link profit
"According to Starbreeze, the studio is keen to produce intellectual properties" - bit informal
"After the 2012 departure of many employees, and the disappointing commercial sales of Syndicate" - already linked before, de-link
"in Starbreeze's ability to make games that are more than typical AAA games" - this too needs de-linking, as it's linked before
No dead links
No dabs

I don't see any real reason to put this on hold, so I think I'll just pass it outright. Well done! Would be good if the citation issue could be addressed. JAGUAR 19:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: Thanks for the review! I have addressed the issues you raised above. AdrianGamer (talk) 15:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]