Talk:State Highway 23 (New Zealand)

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Oceania Highways Task Force.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Accessibility of the traffic counts table

With that many columns, it's quite the scroll rightwards to get to the edge of the table to find the show/hide widget. This is problematic.

At a minimum, I'd suggest that someone rotate the orientation of the table because as additional years are added, it will only get wider. and more troublesome.

Honestly, that whole section of the article should be deleted. Just give us the highest and lowest counts in the route description. For example, a sentence mentioning a location could have "..., the location of the lowest traffic at number vehicles on average daily in year" added. Every few years, just update the counts to keep the article current. That's how several FAs on American highways are done, and it just works better than bogging people down in a lot of statistics. Imzadi 1979 → 21:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The summary is "Traffic roughly quadrupled over the period 1975 to 2018". The collapsed table only takes up a couple of lines, but is there for those who want to check that summary, or see other detail. Johnragla (talk) 21:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, at a minimum, the axes need to be pivoted on this table. On my screen, the rightmost column is the one for 1991, and I have to scroll two more window widths to get to the show/hide widget. If instead the table had the locations on the horizontal axis of the table and the years on the vertical, it would, or should nearly, fit on my screen without scrolling. As editors continue to add additional years to the table, this issue will only get worse. Imzadi 1979 → 22:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]