Talk:Stereo Realist
Appearance
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The "unusually elaborate routne" described for using this camera is not significantly more nor less elaborate than many cameras of its era.
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.—Chowbok 02:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
It should be noted, however, that the lack of a self cocking shutter did make it more complicated to use compared to several stereo cameras made in the same era, the Kodak stereo camera, for example, which had self cocking shutters. John Alan Elson★ WF6I A.P.O.I. 18:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Recent changes
[edit]You had the image overlapping the text, thus making part of the text unreadable and the formatting was a disaster! John Elson (talk) 04:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC)