Talk:Storage Resource Broker
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Comment from 2007
[edit]Hi. I'm new to this stuff, and this is a lot of jargon. How about a layman's paragraph up front to say what is actually going on :) Thanks, Eric
Seems Neutral
[edit]The article seems neutral and the editors personal opinions don't seem to be expressed. An aspect that may seem not neutral is that there are only pros and no cons to it. Therefore I haven't taken of the tag and this would count as first attempt. Airbender3 (talk) 02:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
[edit]I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:26, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, this has been stagnant for a while. As far as I can tell, it was an attempt to get some government grants by using lots of acronyms and Capital Letters a while back. Will take a look to see if it has historical value or should be deleted. W Nowicki (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Storage Resource Broker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130702055848/http://www.sdsc.edu/srb/index.php/What_is_the_SRB to http://www.sdsc.edu/srb/index.php/What_is_the_SRB
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130702051923/http://www.sdsc.edu/profile/rmoore.html to http://www.sdsc.edu/profile/rmoore.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)