Talk:Sulindac
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sulindac article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Sulindac.
|
Knowing when to ask for help
[edit]Guys, if something broke, I'm sure there's a venue in which to find help -- search a little. I found an easy way to fix this, then a right way to fix this. Neither involved leaving a message on the main page that it had broken. The <nowiki> and </nowiki> tags helped work around the problem of the complex [[ problem. Thanks for fixing the name, though! --Thatnewguy (talk) 11:41, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Is my cite court tag for "Bartlett v. Mut. Pharm." correct?
[edit]I changed:
"Bartlett v. Mut. Pharm. Co., Inc., 678 F.3d 30, 34 (1st Cir. 2012)."
To:
{{cite court
- |litigants= Bartlett v. Mut. Pharm. Co., Inc.
- |vol=678
- |reporter=F.3d
- |opinion=30
- |court=D.C. Cir.
- |date=March 19, 2013
- |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-142
- |accessdate=Sept 3, 2017
}}
I'm not a lawyer, so is this correct in terms of which numbers are where? Is there a "preferred" case law site to use? There is also a PDF link here that should be more stable as it is supremecourt.gov.. (I'll refrain from a joke regarding current U.S. politics.) Jimw338 (talk) 03:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)