Talk:Surfside Beach, South Carolina

United States: South Carolina / Myrtle Beach Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina - Myrtle Beach (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of Surfside Beach, South Carolina be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in South Carolina may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Notability of "Attractions" and Roads Through the Town

Should the references to "Attractions" and to the roads (other than US 17 and SC 544, which seem to have their own wiki links) be kept? Are they notable? There seems to be no other information available on them, and the attractions section, in particular, almost belongs in an AAA tourbook, rather than in an encyclopedia article. I'm not going to make the edits myself, but rather wanted to call attention to these to see whether others agreed that these portions should be removed or shown to be notable. Xenophon777 14:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-working of history section, possible copyvio removed

This addition had been marked as copyvio. I originally thought that the source of the information was a Wikipedia mirror, and removed the tag. Mapsax (talk · contribs) pointed out that it was potentially more complex than I thought, dug into the history and found some additional sources. I have reworked this section. It now is not flagged up by Earwig as copyvio, though there are still similarities for the demographics section to other sites.

I have not requested revision deletion for the 2007 information, as it is so long ago and I think would be complex to do and involve the loss of edit history.

Hoping this is ok, but if editors with expertise about US local history want to have a look, that would be great. There are still some statements I have not been able to find a source for and have tagged citation needed. Tacyarg (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]