Talk:Systems engineering process

MIL STD 499

My understanding is that MIL STD 499 is a systems engineering management standard, not an SE process definition. --Allan McInnes (talk) 04:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Early versions of 499 treated systems engineering management as a superset of systems engineering. The completed, but never signed 499B was primarily a practice standard. ComputerGeezer (talk) 21:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

figure 2?

In the paragraph 'Process Discription' 'figure 2' is referred to, but only fig.1 and fig.3 are visible

also figure 1 doesn't mean anything and figure3 is a broken link.--MarmotteiNoZ 10:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the file history, and on User_talk:E.Keegstra there's a note that User:Sfan00_IMG suspected there might be a copyright issue with the images and speedily deleted them -- 4 years after they were added (and long after User_talk:E.Keegstra gave up on Wikipedia.) Of course rather than editing the article to remove the links, the editor just left a trail of broken and misdirected links in now meaningless sentances. This is how we improve Wikipedia (and why the project has stagnated over the past few years...) 214.4.238.180 (talk) 20:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Software

Systems engineering is not software engineering, so explicit references to software in the Activities and Concepts chapters should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjmarques (talk • contribs) 14:11, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]