This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Aside from the first paragaph, I consider the rest of the article to have been written in a manner biased towards the company. Much of it is uncited. The previous version seemed to be written by a ex-employee or employee, and although it raised some interesting achievements it seemed slightly biased view against the company (maybe a "at the coal face opinion"?). Whatever the case, I propose to delete uncited information, leaving the first paragraph. Surfing bird 02:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing there have been no objections, I've removed much of uncited "pro advertising" content.
