Talk:The Battle of Alexander at Issus/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I will do the GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 20:14, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This sentence confuses me, "Despite, or because of lying outside his usual range, the painting has become his most famous work." The prose is not very clear, please clean up.

I have added a ^{[citation needed]} template to the Subject and provenance section. The assertions made just before the template should be referenced.

The article is fairly short for a GA. That said I can't think of much more content that is not already in the article. Perhaps expanding on some of what is there would help but I don't see justification in raising a comprehensive argument. The images are good, the writing is fair, the references are good though there could be some more in-line citations. At this point I don't feel as though it would take much to clean up the article and I would like to hold it for a week and allow that to happen. I will notify the interested projects and editors in the hopes that some work can be done to clean up some of the prose and address the referencing needs. H1nkles (talk) 20:35, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have sources and a good mind to flesh this out. I'll see what I can do over the next few days. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is ok now. The length is not inappropriate for an article on a single work, though certainly more could be said. Johnbod (talk) 18:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much work has been done to the article since my review. I feel as though my concerns have been addressed and I will keep it at GA. Thank you for your efforts. H1nkles (talk) 17:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]