Talk:The Baylor Lariat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United States / Texas (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (marked as Low-importance).
 

Merge proposal[edit]

Oppose. The idea should be to expand on notable topics, rather than merge/delete them. Otherwise, we could just simply get rid of all the stubs by combining them with closely-related articles. →Wordbuilder (talk) 21:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

delete or merge. University papers are not inherently notable and require reliable sources like any other article. This is currently an unsourced one line article. Nuttah (talk) 22:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Comment. Unsourced, one-line articles can be considered notable and allowed to remain so they can be expanded. →Wordbuilder (talk) 23:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
That article has an external link discussing the subject, by either way WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is irrelevant. Nuttah (talk) 05:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
That article's link to a blog made it notable? Please direct me to the Wikipedia guideline or policy stating that inserting an external link to a blog helps establish notability. Thanks! →Wordbuilder (talk) 14:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is irrelevant, we are discussing this article. Nuttah (talk) 07:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Either way, the Baylor University article is already bigger than the ideal size. Merging this article will only make it worse. →Wordbuilder (talk) 16:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Nearly seven weeks has passed and there is no consensus to merge the article, so I am removing the template. →Wordbuilder (talk) 21:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)