This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Would you say the following statement is accurate/ belongs in the article? "It is widely regarded as an example of government mismanagement of Indian lands." If not, how would rephrase it? Mff2020 (talk) 04:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted the orphan tag and added the undue weight tag. This article is an important subject, which relates to reservations and the unforeseen consequences of executive orders and acts of Congress. While I am sympathetic towards the Navajo, this article deals with a land dispute with two parties and outside parties(who have a substantial interest that goes well beyond curiosity into the investment realm).
Two unique reservation facts? The Navajo are the only tribe removed from their traditional lands and then sent back. I wonder if there are other situations where there is a reservation of one tribe, surrounded by a reservation of another? It would appear that in 1868 treaty the Hopi were specifically ignored, as were the Navajo in 1882 treaty. In my opinion, that was the start of the mismanagement that extended to the Bennett Freeze. Rcollman (talk) 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
