Talk:The Churchill Factor
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance
[edit]The reviews we include say it is a naff history book written in a self-serving way to promote Johnson. This might be the consensus view of academia and journalists, though if it's not, then we're lacking balance. Solipsism 101 (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- The Times is more complimentary.[1] Solipsism 101 (talk) 15:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)