Talk:The European Conservative

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 May 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

Hi, the article is relevant and has references. I consider the demand for deletion as possibly politically motivated?

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Pepe1979 (talk) 17:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC) I don‘t see there any promotional tone or style. It‘s simply a collection of facts about the Review.[reply]

Could it be that the demand for deletion is politically motivated?

Usernames associated with edits[edit]

This page should be reviewed on a factual basis as it reads highly promotional, and the usernames associated with the edits lead me to believe that something is going on. 'Pepe' and 'European Conservative' (the last who may themselves be running this). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marleeashton (talk • contribs) 08:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biased sourcing[edit]

Hey there, I added the "unreliable sources" template to the "Controversy" section for two reasons: (1) all of the sources in the section have a conservative slant, (2) all of the sources are included at the end, making it difficult to tell which statement is attributed to which source.

Here are the sources cited at the time of my adding the template:

Sa, Von Marco Gallina; September 2022, 3 (2022-09-03). "Die Cancel Culture reibt sich an Scrutons Erben". Tichys Einblick (in German). Retrieved 2022-10-21.
"UK Bookstore Chain Cancels Catholic-Friendly Journal for Wrongthink". NCR. Retrieved 2022-10-21.
Toro, Marisa de (2022-09-10). "No sufrirás pensamientos ni deseos conservadores". La Gaceta de la Iberosfera (in Spanish). Retrieved 2022-10-21.
Hayward, Steven (2022-09-10). "Loose Ends (182)". Power Line. Retrieved 2022-10-21
"Wie ein konservatives Magazin aus dem Handel verbannt wird" (in German). 2022-09-13. Retrieved 2022-10-21.

Wracking (talk) 07:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]