Talk:The Flying Pigs

user steverance has a noted interest as a member of Flying Pig Productions.

General notabilty and Neutral Point of View

Without wishing to sound like I'm wasting my time here I have no idea what else to do to establish good secondary sources. There are various newspaper articles and references/links to the BBC website. Can I ask if these count or not? If not can you explain what else is actually required for this then please feel free to volunteer some information because I'm struggling at this point. With regard to Neutral Point of View, my impression was that I had created an article that fact based only and did not contain any bias. Further the guidelines state Assert facts, including facts about opinions—but do not assert the opinions themselves. If there is doubt about these things then can we point them out. I'm looking for help here, constructive help with the article. Can anyone help please? I have tried to be impartial, the article is not for promotional purposes it merely records a history and information about the group Steverance (talk) 01:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"scampering, wild eyed younger version" is not encyclopedic language. Neither is the use of first names for subjects. The tone is informal and chatty, rather than straightforward. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title?

Should the title of this article be Flying Pig Productions? (There *is* currently a redirect from there.) Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 23:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]