Talk:The London Paper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject London (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Journalism (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Notable[edit]

I would argue this newspaper is notable - it is the first newspaper to directly compete with the Evening Standard and Associated Press's monopoly on the London evening newspaper industry since 1980. Hence this brings competition to the evening paper market in London for the first time in two decades. I shall edit the article to make this point. EAi 15:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I second that, the London Paper is much better quality newspaper than tory aka daily mail old toofs run LondonLite, which will wait for any excuse to have a pop at Mayor Ken.

I hate companies that are related to the daily mail, people compalian about News Corp, well what about the Daily Mail Trust.. ITN, ITV News, Evening Standard, Daily Mail newspaper, londonlite..

Closure[edit]

Adding to this section, as the BBC reports that the paper is to have its last print-run today.

Beck13 (talk) 09:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)



ThelondonpaperThe London PaperWP:MOSTM. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 16:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Support. The BBC, our only reliable source for the article, use the version of the name with conventional spelling and capitalization. Tevildo (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.