Talk:The Long Game/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 13:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this one for a review later. I met Simon Pegg once. :) Miyagawa (talk) 13:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks generally good. Only query about the references is the one included in the bibliography - is the question mark meant to be there after Smith each time?
- Yeah, I know it's weird and puzzling, but it's basically everywhere in the book and usually credited as such (see this and this). I've generally it in. Glimmer721 ^talk 22:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lead covers all the main points.
Infobox image meets the fair use criteria.
Plot: TARDIS could do with a link.
- Done. Glimmer721 ^talk 22:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Christine Adams) linked should follow the first mention of Cathica. Same with the other parts in the plot that weren't mentioned in the lead. Some editors like to include the actors featured in the lead in the plot too - I don't bother with that, but you can if you want to.
- Added her. Weirdly, none of the other characters that aren't in the lead are in the plot. Glimmer721 ^talk 22:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There was a few minor edits required, but nothing spectacularly bad. No prose issues as far as I can tell, it all reads fine to me. Only thing I think is missing from the article is details over home media releases. Miyagawa (talk) 20:58, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added it too, based on the series five articles. I also added the weekly ratings placings. Thanks for the speedy review! Glimmer721 ^talk 22:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks good. I think it now meets the GA criteria! Nice job. Miyagawa (talk) 22:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]