Talk:The Opportunities Party

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Green Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles

Party metadata

This New Zealand article has some associated metadata templates to display political party colours and names in election candidate and results tables.

The table below shows the content of these metadata templates.

The Opportunities Party — political party metadata
Color		Shortname
	#32DAC3	Opportunities

Big tent

I would question whether TOP is a big tent party. This implies seeking to get the support of as many people as possible. However TOP does not do this - it is instead a collection of fringe interests, ranging from essentially Social Credit, Socialist, to environmental extremism.203.80.61.102 (talk) 02:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to edit the 'big tent' comment out but it was reverted without any comment. This is sort of thing that drives people away from Wikipedia. There is absolutely nothing in the reference attached describing TOP, implicitly or explicitly, as a big tent party. It does say that TOP would work with any other party, but that is not the same as a 'big tent' party that fosters many different points of view within it. I am deleting it again. 130.225.0.251 (talk) 15:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should it need a reference though? The Big tent page on Wikipedia describes the label to mean; "...a political party that seeks to attract voters from different points of view and ideologies. This is in contrast to other parties that defend a determined ideology and seek voters who adhere to that ideology and convince people towards it." That seems like a pretty good summation of TOP's policies in 2017. Kiwichris (talk) 23:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TOP does not generally care where in the political spectrum an idea comes from, assessing it instead on its merits.

It's a small, big tent party with regard to policy. Parsons A (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Centrism?

Reading TOP policy, it truly does not look like they are anymore a centrist party, but a centre-left one. Someone prior mentioned 'big tent' which would also be a good descriptor, however focusing on the centre left. UBI for example is not a centrist policy. This clearly differs from when they were founded, however parties do evolve. Thoughts? WBPchur ^{💬●✒️●💛} 01:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

TOP is a centrist party. Your assertion that UBI is 'not centrist' is incorrect. It depends entirely upon your frame of reference as to how you interpret the political positioning of a UBI.

'Big tent' is apt. Parsons A (talk) 22:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Social issues

What's TOP's stance on moral issues like abortion and euthanasia and the preferred prostitution model or gun rights? In the Topic of abortion I suspect they haven't got clarified stance and I'm not able to find appropriate information on matters like euthaniasa and prostitition and gun rights — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.182.197.253 (talk) 17:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Use Google, use those in a keyword search, and use "site:top.org.nz" in your search. You should find content on these topics. Parsons A (talk) 22:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bias?

This is a very bad Wikipedia page. It breaks a lot of the rules on this site. It seems like it was written by someone who interns for the party. I can't be bothered to fix this. But somebody should. Graveyjones5 (talk) 10:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]