Talk:The War Wagon

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Westerns: Film High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Film task force.

two picture deal at Universal was "The War Wagon," & "Hell Fighters"...-dm

Untitled

This is a classic John Wayne action film. Yet, with such a big budget, why all the snafus that could be reasonably, or, freely, corrected?:

The character Taw Jackson (John Wayne) mentions the War Wagon's guards: "Each carries a Henry rifle..with 60 rounds of ammunition". Yet, they carry 1894 or 1892 Winchesters. Henrys were pretty much dated by 1873 – the movie appears to be in the 1880s or 1890s.

Two of Pierce's hired gunmen (Bruce Dern and another) carry what looks like .30-30 or .30-40 Krag ammunition in their bandoliers, yet carry 1892 Winchester carbines in .44-40 caliber.

The character Wes (Keenan Wynn) asks Taw Jackson if he'd: "Ever seen a round like This, before?" Jackson replies:"Yeah, Gatling Gun!" The Gatling Gun was Standardized after the Civil war in the US to chamber the issue US Army .45-70 (.45 US Govt) cartridge; such a round would have raised no eyebrows. No special chambering was ever made. Even standard 30 mm cannon rounds for the Spanish-American War.

The "nitoglycerine" stolen at Pierce's safe is in glass stoppered reagent bottles--this is the Stupidest way it could be contained. Any nitro on the ground glass surfaces of the stopper would be subjected to friction on closing or opening, and explode. The "nitro" looks and runs like Water. Commercial-grade would appear like olive oil. Putting it in gin bottles so it wouldn't be noticed would be wrong--whiskey would resemble its color, better. The nitro smoking white when being poured is accurate, though. It was transported in zinc cans from the Nobel factory. Even if made on-the-spot, it wouldn't be in a reagent bottle.

The old-fashioned safe with the brass combination lock is Vintage and refreshing, for a change.

When Pierce first addresses his new Gatling Gun, he moves the breech latch up and down, like some sort of "combination lock". Moving it would simply allow the breech cover to swing outward. There is no magazine in the Gatling at the time. Yet, he "cranks off" 25 rounds or so. When finished, there is Still no magazine apparent. Tintinteslacoil (talk) 02:42, 24 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tintinteslacoil (talk • contribs) 02:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC) The opening paragraph leaves out Kirk Douglas and Bruce Cabot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.222.66.2 (talk) 00:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made one small change.

The article described the movie as a "western", which is true enough, but it would be more accurate to call it a western comedy. I don't mean that in a derogatory sense. John Wayne made other western comedies, such as "McClintock!" and "North to Alaska", and I believe this picture has enough comedic aspects to justify it being classified as such.67.45.112.186 (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's an astute observation. The comedy is more low-key and less broad but it's there. Kirk Douglas jumping around in his black leather outfit is comical in itself on top of everything else. I don't think of this as among Wayne's best (that would be The Big Trail, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance and The Searchers) but it's certainly worth a look. Trocadero Thunder (talk) 10:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne's lung removed

Before John Wayne did this movie, he'd just had a lung removed due to lung cancer. This slowed him down a lot. Kirk Douglas felt for him, a respected actor who had trouble even drawing a good breath at the movie location's altitude. 65.129.176.4 (talk) 18:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne as "bad guy"

Apparently Roger Ebert noted that Wayne plays a "bad guy" in this picture for "just about" the first time in his career. He's not actually "bad" in this one but I do recommend taking a look at Wake of the Red Witch a couple of decades earlier, an offbeat quasi-remake of Reap the Wild Wind in which Wayne plays an actual villain and the leading man rolled into one. Wayne's personality was so much richer and more powerful even than Kirk Douglas' that he makes a really scary villain. Trocadero Thunder (talk) 10:09, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

War Wagon film poster.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]