Talk:The WayOut Club

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The Wayout is important because as stated in the article it was one of the better known venuse in london, comapred to others.

Google gives 3000 hits.

TO those speeding, please check the links given. In additon also check:

http://www.thewayoutclub.com/history.htm#reviews and http://www.thewayoutclub.com/history.htm

If it's not notable or important then please speedy, but some guidelines on what venues do aulify under notability guidelines would be appreciated. ShakespeareFan00 20:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I don't see Google hits alone -- especially only 3000 -- as justification of notability. While this club might be popular within a notable community, that does not itself make it notable. I'd need to see something remarkable about this club. For example, a historical role in drug culture or a rights movement. A scandal involving the club that made the news might suffice. But Wikipedia is not an entertainment guide. --Davidstrauss 21:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I've read this, I think that page gives you everything you need to establish notability. --Davidstrauss 21:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Primary sources are not enough for notability, some more reliable sources independent of the subject are needed. —Snigbrook 16:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]