Talk:The Wonders of Nature

Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance

	Latter Day Saint movement portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems w/ this article[edit]

Has anyone read The Wonders of Nature ? Surely there must be more to this book than "The Wonders of Nature by Josiah Priest was published in 1826" and that "Page 377 indicates that the origins of the North American Indians were speculated to be of Hebrew descent..." ? If I turned this in as a book report I would surely have to repeat every grade in elementary school. I am adding a POV tag to this article.

There is more in this article about the Book of Mormon than The Wonders of Nature.

Criticism against the Book of Mormon should be placed at the Criticism of the Book of Mormon page.

--CABEGOD 04:10, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems solved[edit]

I've added contents of the book in categories and written some more about the book. The part of the proposed plagiarism is still there but the main focus is now the book The Wonders of Nature and not the proposed plagiarism. The book contains 600 pages and there is a link for the entire book which is on the internet and anyone can read it and add more to this page if nessesary. Andstobax (talk) 09:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]