Talk:Theje/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 21:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
After reviewing a good number of your Eurovision contest articles, here is a song review! --K. Peake 21:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]Rather than having the ref for the English title in the infobox, you should source it in a relevant area of the body
- I've placed that part in the beginning of the Composition and reception section Iaof2017 (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
The release sentence should be swapped with writing/production for the correct order""Theje" is an" → "The song is an"Pipe ballad to Sentimental balladThe critical reception sentence should come directly before the lyric video"as well as on Ramosaj's" → "as well as Ramosaj's"Wikilink black and whitePipe LED screen to LED display
Background and release
[edit]"stated that he intends to participate" → "revealed his intention to participate"Remove commas around Radio Televizioni Shqiptar (RTSH)Remove "of "Theje"" after the digital release part, as the term accompanying is already used
Composition and reception
[edit]"as well as the production" → "as well as the production done""and delve on a" → "and delves into a""he forgive and continue" → "he forgave and continued""received generally positive reviews" → "was met with generally positive reviews" but only critics appear to be sourced, not fans"In a review of ESCUnited" → "In a review for ESCUnited""writer William found it building in" → "writer William saw as building in""two following "epic" chorus'" → "two following "epic" choruses"
Festival i Këngës
[edit]Remove introduction to RTSH because you have already done this previously"Although during his shows, Ramosaj's performance commences" → "During his shows, Ramosaj's performance commenced"Wikilink black and white"and eventually progresses" → "and eventually progressed" but where does the source actually mention this part?
- I removed that part and merged it with the following portion [1]. Iaof2017 (talk) 12:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Dark imagery is not sourcedPipe LED walls to LED display"regarded by media" → "regarded by the media"[18][19][20][21][22] is too many citations at the end of one sentence, so move them around to relevant parts (preferably after punctuation)
Personnel
[edit]- Good
Track listing
[edit]- Good
Release history
[edit]Format → Format(s)
References
[edit]- Copyvio score looks superb at 4.8%!!!
Cite ESCplus as publisher instead on ref 4WP:OVERLINK of Apple Music on the second citation of ref 5Cite YouTube in the via parameter instead on ref 6WP:OVERLINK of Radio Televizioni Shqiptar on ref 13Cite Eurovoix as publisher instead on ref 14Cite Panorama as work/website instead on ref 18
Final comments and verdict
[edit]- On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 08:57, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Kyle Peake: hope you're good. I've solved your comments above with two notes by me. Greetings to you! Iaof2017 (talk) 12:36, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass now, fantastic work once again! --K. Peake 22:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you Kyle Peake for the review. :D Iaof2017 (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)