Talk:Theta Aquarii
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Stellar classification is different in the main body of the article than it is in the info box. Someone might want to check this out. T@nn 08:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
The data in the databox is all over the place. If the distance is right, then the absolute magnitude should be near 0 (right for a giant, spectral class III), not +5. Similarly, the luminosity should be about 100 solar, not 1.2. Absolute magnitude +5.1 would make this a very sunlike star much closer than 10 parsecs, which is out of the question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.37.25 (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- The infobox data is all cited and corrected now, so it should be good. Regards, RJH (talk) 22:12, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Theta Aquarii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100811014924/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_ama_b.htm to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_ama_b.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)