Talk:Three-dimensional face recognition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clay Facial Reconstructions[edit]

Should there be a mention of clay facial reconstructions here? or is this article solely for computer generated imaging? Runa

Unfounded claims[edit]

The article makes the unfounded claim that 3D face recognition is more accurate than 2D face recognition. I'd like to see the source. From what I have heard, 3D face recognition, being a relatively newer and still developing technology, has not reached a level of accuracy comparable to 2D face recognition, let alone fingerprints. I think the Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) 2006 will be the first large scale independent test of 3D face recognition systems.

  • Face it, face recognition, biometrics and whatever else are pure marketing hype. 2D? 3D? Who cares? These things are unrealiable, expensive and in general do not work as intended or advertised. They are, however, very efficient in predating people's privacy, because of all the cameras and recording equipment required. -- Femmina 12:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Three-dimensional face recognition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]