Talk:Throw-away society

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalization Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

--Alex 08:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 September 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amb8675. Peer reviewers: Henny2shoes, Smithlilly3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mel Beebe. Peer reviewers: Mel Beebe.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion comment from 25 July 2005

I don't see how this deserves a speedy deletion. If you don't like this article, why not put it on vfd? Revolución 21:23, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article comment from 16 November 2018

The first sentence of the article reads with a good bit of bias. While I personally agree that disposable consumerism is a negative feature of contemporary western society, Wikipedia articles are not the proper forum for making these arguments. On Wikipedia we are supposed to present the topic from a neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.137.24.5 (talk) 09:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I've addressed this. It's ok to say neutrally that many critics view it as "excessive" consumption, we can't say it in WP's voice. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 07:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

Does anyone see the basis for this link to disposable chopsticks? Probably advertising...doesn't seem to be attached to anything else in the article specifically. IamM1rv (talk) 18:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Link 2 doesn't appear to work. Does it need to be updated? Mel Beebe (talk) 05:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All of the links in the Christian attitudes section have errors! Maybe try deleting and redoing them? Mel Beebe (talk) 18:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information on environmental effects

I think the environmental effects of a throw-away society should have their own subsection. Part of the reason why the concept of a throw-away society is important is the harm done to the environment in exchange for convenience. Mel Beebe (talk) 05:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Waste and Socioeconomic Status

Something that often does not get covered when discussing environmental externalities of any action is how different the effects of those externalities (especially negative) are depending on socioeconomic status. For example, plastic waste from single-use products often ends up in less wealthy communities, simply because wealthier communities can afford to have the waste shipped away. Mel Beebe (talk) 05:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Food Waste

This section is very short and could use to be expanded Amb8675 (talk) 00:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

Cohen, Elizabeth (2003). A Consumers' Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America. May add this as a source after adding in more information Amb8675 (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Amb8675[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Equitable Futures - Internet Cultures and Open Access

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2023 and 12 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WikiEditor1121 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Maisystarr.

— Assignment last updated by Maisystarr (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]