Talk:Tokyo Disneyland/Archive 1

Archive 1

1

"Disney does not own 100% of Disneyland Hong Kong. The Chinese government currently owns 57% of the park"

Sounds very NPOV. Nevermind that there aren't any arguments to back it up.--LucidGA 05:01, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

That and its not necessarily the true reason for superiority, but rather that the Oriental Land Company allows for large budgets in attractions, probably caring for high quality--FigmentJedi 15:42, 18 Mar 2005 (Central Time)

I just removed the line. If someone wants to express it with the NPOV and provide some evidence, they are welcome to put it back. Bobbis 20:10, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I don't have any "hard evidence", but if you are a fan of the parks, you see how much more detail is put into Tokyo Disney parks. They also have many more parades, and just look at how elaborate the DreamLights parade is, then they have a CD released for most of the parades. I love the American parks most of all, but clearly you can tell the budget is much larger in Tokyo than at the American parks. --blm07 18:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

This need a lot of cleanup. The jazz musician 04:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This article actually says "me." "The language barrier prevented me from going for a long time." Seriously.

Head's up: "NPOV" = Neutral Point of View = good.  ;-) --Bobak 22:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

What happened to the rest of the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.52.152 (talk) 07:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 

Personal Opinion

There seems to be a lot of personal opinion going on here, particularly in the second and third sections. And I don't think "The North Korean Incident" merits its own section. That would probably be better suited as part of a more fleshed out trivia section. ✮ Fredo (talk) 03:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

This talk more like a tourist brochure, as well.Hachiko 03:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

A new Pic Idea

I've found a diffrent picture of the Caslte that gives a clearer view without the sun on it. The problum is two things. One, I don't remember how to put on a new picture (its been a while) and I don't know if you guys want this one to stay the way it is or if your open for a change. Well, what's your thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yenrx (talk • contribs) 18:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

"Found" a new picture? This could be a problem. If it is freely licensed then you can head over to Commons and upload it there. If it's a picture off a website then it is probably copyrighted and does not belong here. As I don't know what the picture looks like, I can't really comment on whether it should be included or not. Feel free to be bold and change the picture yourself. Themeparkgc  Talk  21:30, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Tokyo Disney Resort Fireworks

An event that takes place only in Tokyo Disneyland and has no stand-alone value. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 23:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

• Support merging, with extensive pruning of the fireworks article to only what is truly relevant and verifiable. Conifer (talk) 00:34, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

 Boldly moved per talk here.Tiggerjay (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Once Upon A Time (Tokyo Disneyland)

Clearly belongs to main Tokyo Disneyland article, should be merged following appropriate pruning to keep only the salient points. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 10:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Disagree for merging the articles

TYelliot, Sorry to say this.Unfortunately,the two articles are not suitable to be merged into the Tokyo Disneyland article because that article doesn't show the entertainment of the park.Also,in Tokyo Disney Resort Fireworks,almost all the fireworks shows through the years in Tokyo Disneyland are listed.Therefore,the two articles should not be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason Chak (talk • contribs) 13:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)