Talk:Tolkien's impact on fantasy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 05:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I questioned the quote in the "Distinctive Features" subsection as to why the word "udon" is in lowercase, but this is because what precedes it in the text is "[...] and behold! udon [...]", which suggests that it is sort of in the same sentence, but I don't think the text that precedes the word "udon" is needed, so I think it is fine the way it is (explaining the rationale for keeping something that looks wrong)
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	I struggle to find anything to add or correct or suggest for further improvement. Well done! Tea with toast (話) 00:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]