Talk:Tranquillity

FAR too Specific[edit]

This deals only with a narrow, (and biased) economics definition of Tranquility. There is no effort to explain this in broader terms, especially that of philosophy or religion.

This article simply is not good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.168.237 (talk) 13:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tranquility, or tranquillity? The never ending question. 68.114.69.217 04:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I say, both, and have amended the article (with a citation) to reflect this. --Heath 24.127.115.128 15:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tranquillity is the UK english version, according to my dictionary... but since the single-l version returns twice as many results in Google, I suppose most Americans use this. WP:ENGLISH states that national differences (e.g. color/colour) are not important and both varieties are allowed unless the article discusses something related to a particular nation, so I think both are fine. Personally, I'd prefer to stick with the original, UK english spelling, just because... well, it's the original spelling :) Andreas Willow (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. A 2:1 ratio is certainly not overwhelming, and that being so I think we should stick with usual practice in such cases, which is to keep whichever form was used in the original article. There's no reason to change - except, I suppose, if the one-L form even becomes the norm around the world. 86.154.15.160 (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tranquillity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013142009/https://www.cpre.org.uk/filegrab/saving-tranquil-places-report.pdf?ref=2583 to http://www.cpre.org.uk/filegrab/saving-tranquil-places-report.pdf?ref=2583

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]