Talk:Trelby

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Rename file

I accidentally uploaded the logo file as icon64.png. Can an admin rename this file, and modify the value in the page as well. Anil.verve (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Anil.verve[reply]

Self published

A few tags were added. 1) self-published. This is true, though I have tried to maintain a neutral point of view. If any of the moderators can point out non-neutral stuff, I could edit them out. The references to self-published pages are only to refer to facts (liek the older name of the program, and modifications made). What's the process to get this tag removed?.

2) Notability - this is a major new entrant in open-source screenwriting, and as such is notable. (some other articles in Screenwriting category are of equal or lower notabilty, IMO).

Anil.verve (talk) 05:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)Anil.verve[reply]

AFD

This is completely inappropriate: it's a self-promotional page created by the guy himself. There is nothing notable about "Trelby". It is not a "major new entrant". No one uses it. The "feature list" is basically unfounded marketing verbiage. This page should be deleted.

199.168.141.5 (talk) 03:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Major new entrant? - Whats a minor new entrant and who are you to decide? Wikishagnik (talk) 14:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. It is a notable new entrant and a very viable alternative to the few serious open-source/free FD alternatives. Zuckerberg (talk) 13:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the AFD based on the arguments here but the page is still too short for an article. A good reference about the expected presentation would be Delrina Wikishagnik (talk) 08:08, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Python

I edited the page to show what programming language it was written in(python)-September 2012-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.128.234 (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]