Talk:Trigger law

Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world

I think the sentence referencing this paper should stay. This subject has reasonably widespread notability; see for example mentions of Caitlin Myers' updated work in an article at Stacker, and what are apparently over 100 news mentions of this specific cited journal paper. This is a matter that I think is important enough to the concept of Trigger laws to merit inclusion. – Anon423 (talk) 09:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

clarifying language on medically-necessary abortions

I think it's important to maintain clarification that only medically-unnecessary abortions are banned now in some states. Every single US state allows for medically-necessary abortion. Though this is still an affront to personal choice, not clarifying that could mid-educate people in a way that incites violence that could be better-directed into electoral change. The SCOTUS decision on Dobbs can be neutralized in time with legal and political skill. source: the SCOTUS writ, itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shpoffo (talk • contribs) 23:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trigger Laws

please change the opening statment. i am reviewing the trigger laws and none of them ban abortion completly and all allow medial exemption. you are printing fake news 35.129.14.41 (talk) 20:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]