Talk:Trinity School for Children

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Tampa Bay (Rated Redirect-class)
WikiProject icon This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tampa Bay on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Redirect page Redirect  This redirect does not require a rating on the quality scale.
WikiProject Schools (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This redirect is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

School's Credo[edit]

I would like to post the school's credo on it's wikipedia page. The credo has been a published document contained in all of the school's literature since it's inception in 1999. The credo is a statement of the school's mission and I believe it is valuable, factual information that adds to the content on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlisaMurray (talkcontribs) 03:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree. A credo is like a mission statement. It gives you information about a company or school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshPhillips1 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Not sure that "factual" is the right way to describe a 'credo' -- but I see a lot of missions/credos on other school pages. Some have questioned the possibility of copyright infringement on this type of addition, but more concerning alma maters, etc. Take a look at WP:WPSCH/AG and if you think it is appropriate, add it and clarify reasons here. If you feel strongly, I'd say add it. -- Lucas20 (talk) 03:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I think I fixed the tone of the section by putting it in a block quote.--Jorfer (talk) 15:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Further on adding the Credo. First, it's huge. I takes up a significant portion of the article. This may be the reason that there are issues with it. It may be better to paraphrase it or start a section that simply discusses the notability or encyclopedic nature of the statement. Also, a justification of how it meets guidelines set forth in WP:WPSCH/AG should be added. Putting it in as a block I am not sure is really all that important in terms of this larger conversation. -- Lucas20 (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)