Talk:Trinity School for Children

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trinity School for Children redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tampa Bay (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tampa BayWikipedia:WikiProject Tampa BayTemplate:WikiProject Tampa BayTampa Bay articles

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This redirect is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

School's Credo[edit]

I would like to post the school's credo on it's wikipedia page. The credo has been a published document contained in all of the school's literature since it's inception in 1999. The credo is a statement of the school's mission and I believe it is valuable, factual information that adds to the content on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlisaMurray (talk • contribs) 03:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. A credo is like a mission statement. It gives you information about a company or school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshPhillips1 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Not sure that "factual" is the right way to describe a 'credo' -- but I see a lot of missions/credos on other school pages. Some have questioned the possibility of copyright infringement on this type of addition, but more concerning alma maters, etc. Take a look at WP:WPSCH/AG and if you think it is appropriate, add it and clarify reasons here. If you feel strongly, I'd say add it. -- Lucas20 (talk) 03:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I fixed the tone of the section by putting it in a block quote.--Jorfer (talk) 15:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further on adding the Credo. First, it's huge. I takes up a significant portion of the article. This may be the reason that there are issues with it. It may be better to paraphrase it or start a section that simply discusses the notability or encyclopedic nature of the statement. Also, a justification of how it meets guidelines set forth in WP:WPSCH/AG should be added. Putting it in as a block I am not sure is really all that important in terms of this larger conversation. -- Lucas20 (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]